Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Amazon
Amazon
vs
Xiaomi

Nova Lite 1.0 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Nova Lite 1.0 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nova Lite 1.0
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
Nova Lite 1.0
Speed
Nova Lite 1.0

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNova Lite 1.0MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNova Lite 1.0MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAmazonXiaomi
ReleasedDec 2024Dec 2025

Nova Lite 1.0 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nova Lite 1.0 with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nova Lite 1.0 has cheaper input pricing at $0.06/M tokens. Nova Lite 1.0 has cheaper output pricing at $0.24/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Nova Lite 1.0's score of 5.1.
Nova Lite 1.0 has a 300,000 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Nova Lite 1.0 supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.