Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
AN
Anthracite-org
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Magnum v4 72B vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute— We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Magnum v4 72B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Magnum v4 72B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMagnum v4 72BGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMagnum v4 72BGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorAnthracite-orgOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2024Jan 2026

Magnum v4 72B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Magnum v4 72B with:

Compare GPT-5.2-Codex with:

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.2-Codex has cheaper input pricing at $1.75/M tokens. Magnum v4 72B has cheaper output pricing at $5.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Magnum v4 72B's score of N/A.
Magnum v4 72B has a 16,384 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Magnum v4 72B does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.