Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Xiaomi

Claude 3 Haiku vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude 3 Haiku wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Claude 3 Haiku
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Claude 3 Haiku
Speed
Claude 3 Haiku

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 HaikuMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3 HaikuMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedMar 2024Unknown

Claude 3 Haiku Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3 Haiku with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude 3 Haiku has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Claude 3 Haiku has cheaper output pricing at $1.25/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Claude 3 Haiku's score of 6.7.
Claude 3 Haiku has a 200,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Claude 3 Haiku supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.