Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude 3 Opus vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude 3 Opus wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Claude 3 Opus
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3 OpusGPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownDec 2025

Claude 3 Opus Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $10.50/M tokens. Claude 3 Opus has cheaper output pricing at $75.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Claude 3 Opus's score of 19.5.
Claude 3 Opus has a 200,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Claude 3 Opus supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.