Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Anthropic
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude Sonnet 4.6
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 HaikuClaude Sonnet 4.6
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedNov 2024Feb 2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude 3.5 Haiku has cheaper input pricing at $0.80/M tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's score of 10.7.
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a 200,000 token context window, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision. Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision.