Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Xiaomi

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 HaikuMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedNov 2024Unknown

Claude 3.5 Haiku Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3.5 Haiku with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude 3.5 Haiku has cheaper input pricing at $0.80/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's score of 10.7.
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a 200,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.