Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Z-ai

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Supports vision

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 HaikuGLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 HaikuGLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicZ-ai
ReleasedNov 2024Mar 2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3.5 Haiku with:

Compare GLM-5 Turbo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude 3.5 Haiku has cheaper input pricing at $0.80/M tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
GLM-5 Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.8, compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's score of 10.7.
Claude 3.5 Haiku has a 200,000 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports vision. GLM-5 Turbo does not support vision.