Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Anthropic
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 4.6

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Sonnet 4.6
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 SonnetClaude Sonnet 4.6
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedOct 2024Feb 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has cheaper input pricing at $3.00/M tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has cheaper output pricing at $15.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's score of 30.2.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a 200,000 token context window, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports vision. Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision.