Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins:

  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.5 SonnetMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.5 SonnetMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicMinimax
ReleasedOct 2024Mar 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's score of 30.2.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a 200,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.