Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Xiaomi

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude 3.7 SonnetMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude 3.7 SonnetMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2025Unknown

Claude 3.7 Sonnet Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's score of 26.7.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.