Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Haiku 4.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Claude Haiku 4.5
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5GPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2025Jan 2026

Claude Haiku 4.5 Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Haiku 4.5 has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 has cheaper output pricing at $5.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's score of 29.6.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Claude Haiku 4.5 supports vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.