Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4 vs text-davinci-002

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

text-davinci-002 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Claude Opus 4
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4
Context Window
Claude Opus 4
Speed
Claude Opus 4

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4text-davinci-002
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4text-davinci-002
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedMay 2025Unknown

Claude Opus 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

text-davinci-002 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4 has cheaper input pricing at $15.00/M tokens. text-davinci-002 has cheaper output pricing at $20.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4 has a 200,000 token context window, while text-davinci-002 has a 4,097 token context window.
Claude Opus 4 supports vision. text-davinci-002 does not support vision.