Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Xiaomi

Claude Opus 4 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Claude Opus 4
Speed
Claude Opus 4

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedMay 2025Unknown

Claude Opus 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Claude Opus 4's score of N/A.
Claude Opus 4 has a 200,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Claude Opus 4 supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.