Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Deepcogito

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Sponsor Price Per Token Reach 5000+ developers comparing LLM APIs

125 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in January.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Claude Opus 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$3.50 Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$3.50 Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Cache Read (per 1M)$500000.00N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Cache Write (per 1M)$6250000.00N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B is 65% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $5.00 (Cheapest)
Google $5.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $5.00 (Cheapest)

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B Providers

Together $3.50 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
43.0--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
42.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
73.8--
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
32,768
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 84% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405BWinner
Tokens/second78.8 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.72sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicDeepcogito
ReleasedNov 2025Oct 2025

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Compare Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has cheaper input pricing at $3.50/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has cheaper output pricing at $3.50/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B's score of N/A.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has a 32,768 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B does not support vision.