Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 3.1 405B (base)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

112 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.1 405B (base) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Claude Opus 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.1 405B (base)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$4.00 Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$4.00 Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.50N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Cache Write (per 1M)$6.25N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 405B (base) is 60% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 405B (base) Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
Llama 3.1 405B (base) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.1 405B (base)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
43.1--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
42.9--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.9--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
73.8--
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 405B (base)
32,768
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 84% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.1 405B (base)Winner
Tokens/second54.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token1.43sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.1 405B (base)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedNov 2025Aug 2024

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Llama 3.1 405B (base) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Compare Llama 3.1 405B (base) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 405B (base) has cheaper input pricing at $4.00/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B (base) has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Llama 3.1 405B (base)'s score of N/A.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B (base) has a 32,768 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Llama 3.1 405B (base) does not support vision.