Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0.10 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$0.32 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.50$0.13 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Cache Write (per 1M)$6.25N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is 98% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
43.114.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
42.910.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.77.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.971.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.049.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
73.828.8
Aider
Real-world code editing
-59.4-
AIME
Competition math
-30.0-
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.3 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/second63.2 tok/s99.5 tok/s
Time to First Token1.33s0.54s
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct responds 57% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedNov 2025Dec 2024

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.