Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 4 Maverick wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Llama 4 Maverick
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Llama 4 Maverick
Speed
Llama 4 Maverick

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Llama 4 MaverickWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0.15 Llama 4 Maverick
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$0.60 Llama 4 Maverick
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.50N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Cache Write (per 1M)$6.25N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 4 Maverick is 97% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 4 Maverick Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
6
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
Llama 4 Maverick Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Llama 4 MaverickWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
43.118.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
42.915.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.719.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.980.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.067.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
73.839.7
Aider
Real-world code editing
-15.6-
AIME
Competition math
-39.0-
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
1,048,576
tokens
Llama 4 Maverick has a 81% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Llama 4 MaverickWinner
Tokens/second63.2 tok/s129.9 tok/s
Time to First Token1.33s0.47s
Llama 4 Maverick responds 105% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Llama 4 Maverick
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Llama 4 Maverick
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedNov 2025Apr 2025

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Llama 4 Maverick Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Compare Llama 4 Maverick with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. Llama 4 Maverick has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Llama 4 Maverick's score of 15.6.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Llama 4 Maverick has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Llama 4 Maverick supports vision.