Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Devstral 2 2512

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Devstral 2 2512

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Devstral 2 2512
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Devstral 2 2512
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMistral AI
ReleasedNov 2025Dec 2025

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Devstral 2 2512 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Devstral 2 2512 has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Devstral 2 2512's score of 23.7.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision.