Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0711

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Kimi K2 0711 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0711
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Claude Opus 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Kimi K2 0711
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Kimi K2 0711
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMoonshotai
ReleasedNov 2025Jul 2025

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Kimi K2 0711 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0711 has cheaper input pricing at $0.55/M tokens. Kimi K2 0711 has cheaper output pricing at $2.20/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Kimi K2 0711's score of 22.1.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Kimi K2 0711 has a 131,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Kimi K2 0711 does not support vision.