Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMoonshotai
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision.