Key Takeaways
Claude Opus 4.5 wins:
- Larger context window
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
- Better at math
- Supports vision
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
- Faster response time
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | $0.10 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $25.00 | $0.40 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | $0.50 | N/A | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Cache Write (per 1M) | $6.25 | N/A | Claude Opus 4.5 |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 98% cheaper overall.
Claude Opus 4.5 Providers
No provider data available
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
7
Benchmarks Compared
6
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.5 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | 43.1 | 14.6 | |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | 42.9 | 10.5 | |
Math Index Mathematical reasoning | 62.7 | 8.0 | |
MMLU Pro Academic knowledge | 88.9 | 69.2 | |
GPQA Graduate-level science | 81.0 | 48.1 | |
LiveCodeBench Competitive programming | 73.8 | 29.0 | |
AIME Competition math | - | 13.7 | - |
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 34% larger context window.
Speed Performance
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | 63.2 tok/s | 82.7 tok/s | |
| Time to First Token | 1.33s | 0.24s |
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 responds 31% faster on average.
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.5 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Claude Opus 4.5 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Author | Anthropic | Nvidia |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Oct 2025 |
Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities
Input
fileimagetext
Output
text
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities
Input
text
Output
text