Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.5
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.5
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$0.04 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$0.16 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.50$0.10 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Write (per 1M)$6.25N/A Claude Opus 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 99% cheaper overall.

Claude Opus 4.5 Providers

No provider data available

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
5
Claude Opus 4.5 Wins
0
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
43.113.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
42.97.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
62.762.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
88.973.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.055.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
73.870.1
Claude Opus 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Opus 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Opus 4.5
200,000
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Tokens/second63.2 tok/s137.2 tok/s
Time to First Token1.33s0.53s
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 responds 117% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.5Nemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicNvidia
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025

Claude Opus 4.5 Modalities

Input
fileimagetext
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 42.9, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Claude Opus 4.5 has a 200,000 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.5 supports vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.