Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Anthropic
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Claude Sonnet 4 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Claude Sonnet 4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedFeb 2026May 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Claude Sonnet 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 with:

Compare Claude Sonnet 4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Sonnet 4 has cheaper input pricing at $3.00/M tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 has cheaper output pricing at $15.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Claude Sonnet 4's score of 30.6.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Claude Sonnet 4 has a 200,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision.