Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Cognitive Computations

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicCognitive Computations
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Dolphin 2.9.2 Qwen2 72B does not support vision.