Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Cohere
Cohere

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Command A

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Command A wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Command A
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Command A
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Command A
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicCohere
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Command A has cheaper input pricing at $2.50/M tokens. Command A has cheaper output pricing at $10.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Command A's score of 9.9.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Command A has a 256,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Command A does not support vision.