Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
D
Deepcogito

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicDeepcogito
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has cheaper input pricing at $3.50/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has cheaper output pricing at $3.50/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B does not support vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.