Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

Claude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicDeepseek
ReleasedFeb 2026Sep 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision.