Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Code Llama 34B Python

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Code Llama 34B Python wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Code Llama 34B Python
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Code Llama 34B Python
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Code Llama 34B Python
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Code Llama 34B Python Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Code Llama 34B Python has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Code Llama 34B Python has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Code Llama 34B Python has a 16,384 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Code Llama 34B Python does not support vision.