Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 2 70B Chat

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Llama 2 70B Chat wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 2 70B Chat
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Llama 2 70B Chat
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Llama 2 70B Chat
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 2 70B Chat Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 2 70B Chat has cheaper input pricing at $1.95/M tokens. Llama 2 70B Chat has cheaper output pricing at $2.56/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Llama 2 70B Chat has a 4,096 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Llama 2 70B Chat does not support vision.