Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 405B (base)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.1 405B (base) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B (base)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2024

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 405B (base) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 405B (base) has cheaper input pricing at $4.00/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B (base) has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B (base) has a 32,768 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Llama 3.1 405B (base) does not support vision.