Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Mistral Medium 3.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Mistral Medium 3.1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicMistral AI
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's score of 18.3.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision.