Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Nemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicNvidia
ReleasedFeb 2026Sep 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.