Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-4 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6GPT-4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6GPT-4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2026May 2023

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-4 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4.6 has cheaper input pricing at $5.00/M tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 has cheaper output pricing at $25.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to GPT-4's score of 13.1.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GPT-4 has a 8,191 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. GPT-4 does not support vision.