Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-OSS-20b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GPT-OSS-20b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-20b
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
GPT-OSS-20b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6GPT-OSS-20b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6GPT-OSS-20b
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-OSS-20b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-20b has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. GPT-OSS-20b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to GPT-OSS-20b's score of 18.5.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GPT-OSS-20b has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. GPT-OSS-20b supports vision.