Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4.6 vs o1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

o1 wins:

  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
o1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6o1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6o1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2024

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

o1 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4.6 has cheaper input pricing at $5.00/M tokens. Claude Opus 4.6 has cheaper output pricing at $25.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to o1's score of 20.5.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while o1 has a 200,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. o1 supports vision.