Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Claude Opus 4.6 vs o3

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

o3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
o3
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
o3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6o3
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6o3
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedFeb 2026Apr 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

o3 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

o3 has cheaper input pricing at $2.00/M tokens. o3 has cheaper output pricing at $8.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to o3's score of 38.4.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while o3 has a 200,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. o3 supports vision.