Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Opengvlab
Opengvlab

Claude Opus 4.6 vs InternVL3 38B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

InternVL3 38B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
InternVL3 38B
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6InternVL3 38B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6InternVL3 38B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicOpengvlab
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

InternVL3 38B Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

InternVL3 38B has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. InternVL3 38B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while InternVL3 38B has a 16,384 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. InternVL3 38B supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.