Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Perplexity
Perplexity

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Sonar

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

Sonar wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Sonar
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Sonar
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Sonar
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicPerplexity
ReleasedFeb 2026Jan 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Sonar Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Sonar has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. Sonar has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Sonar has a 127,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Sonar supports vision.