Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Relace

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Relace Search

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Relace Search wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Relace Search
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Relace Search
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Relace Search
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicRelace
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Relace Search Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Relace Search has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. Relace Search has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Relace Search has a 256,000 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Relace Search does not support vision.