Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Sao10k

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicSao10k
ReleasedFeb 2026Jun 2024

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 has cheaper input pricing at $1.48/M tokens. Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.48/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 has a 8,192 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. Llama 3 Euryale 70B v2.1 does not support vision.