Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Xiaomi

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's score of 25.8.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.