Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
X
Xiaomi

Claude Opus 4.6 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to MiMo v2 Omni's score of 35.5.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.