Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Z-ai

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 4.5V

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM 4.5V wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GLM 4.5V
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
GLM 4.5V

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6GLM 4.5V
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6GLM 4.5V
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM 4.5V Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.5V has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. GLM 4.5V has cheaper output pricing at $1.80/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to GLM 4.5V's score of 10.8.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GLM 4.5V has a 65,536 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. GLM 4.5V supports vision.