Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Z
Z-ai

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM 4.6V

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

GLM 4.6V wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GLM 4.6V
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6GLM 4.6V
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6GLM 4.6V
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM 4.6V Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.6V has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. GLM 4.6V has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to GLM 4.6V's score of 11.1.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GLM 4.6V has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Opus 4.6 supports vision. GLM 4.6V supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.