Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Z-ai

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Opus 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window
Claude Opus 4.6
Speed
Claude Opus 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Opus 4.6GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicZ-ai
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Claude Opus 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. GLM-5 Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Claude Opus 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 47.6, compared to GLM-5 Turbo's score of 36.8.
Claude Opus 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.