Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Google
Google

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.00$1.25 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$10.00 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.30$0.13 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Cache Write (per 1M)$3.75$0.38 Gemini 2.5 Pro
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.5 Pro is 43% cheaper overall.

Claude Sonnet 4 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $3.00 (Cheapest)
Google $3.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $3.00 (Cheapest)

Gemini 2.5 Pro Providers

Google AI Studio $1.00 (Cheapest)
Google $1.25
Vercel $2.50

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Claude Sonnet 4 Wins
7
Gemini 2.5 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.034.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
30.631.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.087.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.786.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
68.384.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
44.980.1
Aider
Real-world code editing
61.3--
AIME
Competition math
40.788.7
Gemini 2.5 Pro shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Sonnet 4
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Sonnet 4
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 5% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 ProWinner
Tokens/second69.8 tok/s151.8 tok/s
Time to First Token1.17s35.93s
Gemini 2.5 Pro responds 118% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedMay 2025Jun 2025

Claude Sonnet 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4 with:

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.25/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $10.00/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Claude Sonnet 4's score of 30.6.
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision.