Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Google
Google

Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4 wins:

  • Has reasoning mode

Gemini 2.5 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4Gemini 2.5 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicGoogle
ReleasedMay 2025Jun 2025

Claude Sonnet 4 Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Gemini 2.5 Pro Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $10.00/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Claude Sonnet 4's score of 30.6.
Claude Sonnet 4 has a 200,000 token context window, while Gemini 2.5 Pro has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4 supports vision. Gemini 2.5 Pro supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.