Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs R1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

R1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
R1
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5R1Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.70 R1
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$2.50 R1
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.30N/A Claude Sonnet 4.5
Cache Write (per 1M)$3.75N/A Claude Sonnet 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, R1 is 81% cheaper overall.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $3.00 (Cheapest)
Google $3.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $3.00 (Cheapest)

R1 Providers

Vercel $0.55 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.70
Azure $1.49
Together $3.00

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
4
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Wins
2
R1 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5R1Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
37.123.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
33.515.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
37.068.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.084.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
72.770.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
59.061.7
Aider
Real-world code editing
-64.0-
AIME
Competition math
-68.3-
Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Sonnet 4.5
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
R1
64,000
tokens
Max output: 16,000 tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 94% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5R1Winner
Tokens/second70.4 tok/s0.0 tok/s
Time to First Token1.07s0.00s
Claude Sonnet 4.5 responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5R1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.5R1
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicDeepseek
ReleasedSep 2025Jan 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

R1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 with:

Compare R1 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.70/M tokens. R1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.5, compared to R1's score of 15.9.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while R1 has a 64,000 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports vision. R1 does not support vision.