Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs R1

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

R1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
R1
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5R1
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.5R1
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicDeepseek
ReleasedSep 2025Jan 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

R1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.55/M tokens. R1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.5, compared to R1's score of 15.9.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while R1 has a 64,000 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports vision. R1 does not support vision.