Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicDeepseek
ReleasedFeb 2026Sep 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus's score of 31.9.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision.