Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 405B (base)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.1 405B (base) wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6Llama 3.1 405B (base)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Llama 3.1 405B (base)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicMeta-llama
ReleasedFeb 2026Aug 2024

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 405B (base) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Sonnet 4.6 has cheaper input pricing at $3.00/M tokens. Llama 3.1 405B (base) has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 405B (base) has a 32,768 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision. Llama 3.1 405B (base) does not support vision.