Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicNvidia
ReleasedFeb 2026Oct 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 7.6.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.